https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282826
Mikhail T. <freebsd-2...@virtual-estates.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |freebsd-2024@virtual-estate
| |s.net
--- Comment #7 from Mikhail T. <freebsd-2...@virtual-estates.net> ---
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #1)
> Do we add changes to a port to also support building without poudriere ?
Kurt, you have it backwards. Ports are meant to be buildable by the end-users:
cd /usr/ports/security/nss
make install clean
It is Poudriere, that's supposed to emulate the above, not the other way
around. Obviously, reproducing all possible configurations is impossible, so
Poudriere is only trying to emulate a "clean" environment. But, when a problem
is pointed out -- such as by this PR -- questioning its validity with "but it
builds with poudriere" is quite wrong.
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #5)
> However, it's gecko@ that needs to make the decision and I'm not on that team.
"Maintainer timeout" is totally a thing...
I'm happy to confirm, the patch worked for me as well -- thank you, Laurent,
for sharing your fix with us -- would a committer, please, commit it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
