On Friday, 22 March 2013 16:20:07 Beeblebrox wrote: > Hi David, thanks for answering.
Not a problem. > First-off, I seem to have mis-understood the available downloads. I thought > that wine-1.5.x-freebsd10 was a source file when it2s a pkgng-ready binary - > so I just did "pkg add" to the file, it installed and it is working. Thanks > for that. :-) > My questions in the first post (although they have become somewhat > irrelevant at this point) were about: > > * self-maintained port is; let's say you found some source code you want to > try but it's not in the ports tree - you can create your own port for it and > compile it as if it were in the ports tree. So it's actually a bit similar > to what your diff script does. Okay, I understand you now. > * By options I very simply meant things like MASTER_SITES, IGNORE_SHA_ERROR, > etc. I have absolutely no experience in writng a Makefile... > > One thing I did find strange when I installed the wine*tbz, was that the > install script detected the video card as Nvidia. In fact, the card is a > Radeon HD 4200 (r600 driver). I'm also using Xorg from trunk, not ports. > make.conf has "WITHOUT_NOUVEAU=yes". Will this error hamper 3D performance? > "Installing wine-fbsd64-1.5.24,1...A NVIDIA GRAPHICS DRIVER HAS BEEN > DETECTED ON THIS SYSTEM AND THE AUTOMATED > PATCHING HAS FAILED, execute (as root) > sh /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh > to get 2D/3D acceleration to work with the nvidia driver. Without this wine > will crash when a program requires 2D/3D graphics acceleration." Thanks is strange. The detection is done using `pkg query` or `pkg_info` as appropriate. Do you perhaps have nvidia-driver port installed or a stale $PREFIX/share/doc/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README? If not, and you have time, I would like to diagnose the incorrect detection. On the user side, since you do not use the nvidia-driver, and the patching failed. You are good to go. :-) Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
