IMHO, is a good thing to keep a visual clue of the level you are going down while writing. So, <sect[123...]> should be kept, I think.
Regards Alberto Mijares On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Gabor Kovesdan <ga...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Em 24-05-2013 19:35, Gabor Kovesdan escreveu: >> >> I'm working on upgrading our documentation set to DocBook 5.0 and I'd like >> to discuss some details. We have some customizations and strange uses, which >> can be expressed with DocBook 5.0's own vocabulary. This upgrade is a good >> opportunity to change these, as well. I propose the following changes in our >> vocabulary: > > One more thing to discuss: shall we maintain the sect1, sect2, ... elements > or just use section? The section element can have another section element > embedded and the numbering in the rendered version is inferred by the level > of embedment. This is more uniform and less redundant. In own docs that I > write with DocBook I only use section and it works fine. Opinions? > > Gabor > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
