On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > > > I'm perfectly happy to support the libkse->libpthread switch, and I'm > > perfectly happy to support making libpthread be the default threading > > library. But, I strongly believe that we need to also treat -pthread > > sanely. > > You have to decide what the therading lib should be indeed. > However recent expirence shows that a 1:n model seems to be the > one the world over you is gearing around: Linux never did anything else. > Windows anyway. Solaris switched from n:m to 1:n on the step between > version 8 and 9.... Having two of them isn't the solution for me as a developer > since I'm simply not interresed in debugging both cases.
This is a reason why -pthread shouldn't imply linking to any one library. If you only want to deal with libthr or libthread (KSE in 1:1 mode), then you are free to choose them and only them. -- Dan Eischen _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
