From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm considering setting up a FreeBSD 5 machine as a dedicated > > backup/archive computer on a network I administer. > > > > I'm curious to hear some opinions on how wise this is. I know > > that 5 is still in a -CURRENT status and I've seen (and repeated) > > the warnings that it's not really production quality yet. > > > > So I'm curious as to a number of facets of its capibilities: > > 1) With the current developmet effort ... does it seem like 5.1 > > will be -STABLE ... or do folks feel that a -STABLE brand > > is further off (5.2?) > > 2) For a dedicated backup server, that can tolerate the > > performance problems that folks have been reporting, and > > won't upset the entire office if it panics on occasion, is 5 > > good enough at this point? > > > > I know this is inviting a lot of opinion and conjecture ... but I need > > some idea of where I can go with this. These folks need a solution > > soon, and I don't want to pass on something that's not ready yet. > > On the flip side, the nature of the beast means that it doesn't NEED > > to be a reliable as I normally expect a FreeBSD server to be, so > > there's a little more tolerance than usual. > > > > Any input is greatly appreciated. > > What's wrong with 4.8-RELEASE?
Doesn't support DVD burning. Sorry ... forgot to specify my reasons ;) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
