> > And I'm not active enough that I feel I have any right to any form of veto. > > > Thanks. I'm not against documenting "something", if I understand > what this "something" should be.
That people absolutely should use ppp -nat instead of pppd+natd, and that this goes even if people ALREADY has a working pppd configuration. Or at least this was my experience when I added this, based on what lead to how much support (which I roughtly equate with problems for the users.) And that this should be documented in the natd manpage, because *that is where the people affected will be looking when they are affected*. > If people want pppd(8) over ppp(8) or mpd(8) for some reason, the only > options to NAT they have are ipnat(8) and natd(8). You sounded like > natd(8) should not be used on anything except NICs, this I strongly > disagree to. I certainly do not for recommending ppp(8) over pppd(8), > or for recommending "ppp -nat" over "ppp + natd", but the former > does not belong to the natd(8) manpage, and the latter is documented > there. I do not understand what you are attempting to say here at all. Ref mpd: I might still have patches to support using libalias with this directly somewhere; I remember submitting them back in 1997 or early 1998. Whistle did not want to integrate them in their mainline, though, as they were using a different NAT library internally. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message