hi, there! On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:05:45PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
> > > > > Portions of the ext2fs source are covered by the GPL. You > > > > > need to rebuild the kernel with "option EXT2FS". The > > > > > FreeBSD cannot create a ext2fs.ko and comply with the GPL. > > > > > > > > This is weird. > > > > Builting it as part of kernel is ok, but separate, as a module > > > > isn't. > > > > > > IIRC NetBSD has BSD-copyrighted ext2fs implementation > > > > Closely tied to their VFS implementation, which is different, of course, > > last I heard it was a fairly heavy task to port it, but something a lot > > of people would like to see. > > Does it work any better/worse than FreeBSD's implementation? I've heard that their implementation is more stable and bug-free. Just a speculation though. Never had a time to look at it. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
