Thus spake Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * De: Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-27 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: add ext2fs to the module list in modules/Makefile ] > > hi, there! > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:40:12AM +0200, Enache Adrian wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:36:35PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > Portions of the ext2fs source are covered by the GPL. You > > > > need to rebuild the kernel with "option EXT2FS". The > > > > FreeBSD cannot create a ext2fs.ko and comply with the GPL. > > > > > > This is weird. > > > Builting it as part of kernel is ok, but separate, as a module > > > isn't. > > > > IIRC NetBSD has BSD-copyrighted ext2fs implementation > > Closely tied to their VFS implementation, which is different, of course, > last I heard it was a fairly heavy task to port it, but something a lot > of people would like to see.
Does it work any better/worse than FreeBSD's implementation? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
