On 15-Dec-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
> Alex wrote:
>> It means that you can not install FreeBSD on a 386 unless you have a
>> 486+ machine that can compile a new FreeBSD system and have a way to
>> get that version to the 386.
> 
> Yes, this is true.  Several of us were annoyed by the change,
> which appeared at the time to have been done solely to handle
> the fact that the newly installed device /dev/random sucked
> too much CPU time to work on a 386.
> 
> The /dev/random code has since improved to not suck so much
> CPU time, but the 386 code was not reenabled.
> 
> The best answer out there is "the majority has spoken", with
> the idea being that if you are deploying on 386 hardware, you
> are an embedded systems vendor, and are willing to live with
> the process effectively being a cross-compilation.

This has nothing to do with /dev/random.  Please stop with the constant
FUDing Terry.

-- 

John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to