In message <007f01c26ae2$09b11ab0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matthew Emmerton" w
rites:
>> >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have
>> >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". I have no opinion
>> >on whether that should be the full expat2 or a stripped down
>> >functionality, but I think we should make it clear that "this
>> >is the expat which the base system needs -- if you do not like
>> >this version, then use the appropriate port and don't complain
>> >to us about which version we install in the base system".
>>
>
>Now I realize that expat is much less complicated than Perl, but have we
>fully addressed interoperability concerns? I know that the /usr vs
>${LOCALDIR}distinction between the base system and ports fixes most of them,
>at least for experienced users.
I think you must have misunderstood the proposal. If the library
and include file are named "libxmlio" or something, I don't see how
ports could be affected.
At least not until somebody starts deliberately looking for that name.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
