In message <p0511170fb9c130cfa786@[128.113.24.47]>, Garance A Drosihn writes:
>I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". I have no opinion >on whether that should be the full expat2 or a stripped down >functionality, but I think we should make it clear that "this >is the expat which the base system needs -- if you do not like >this version, then use the appropriate port and don't complain >to us about which version we install in the base system". It sounds to me like this sums it up nicely. The thing about it I like is that it does not prevent us from taking the other route later on, whereas putting an "official-looking" expat in the tree and yanking that later would be a mess. Any famous last words before the fat lady sings ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
