On 18 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Actually, the bug is in the PAM configuration files that list pam_unix > as a "session" module while pam_unix doesn't provide session > management services. PAM is correct in whining about that. The > solution is to remove lines like this from /etc/pam.d/*: > > session required pam_unix.so
If not pam_unix, what module is responsible for updating utmp? Thats kind of what I thought the 'session' entry for pam_unix implied. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | For Great Justice! | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
