Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Part of the commit log for rev 1.32 of pam_unix.c says: > > - remove dummy functions since OpenPAM handles missing service > functions > > However, OpenPAM is noisy about handling missing service functions: > > Apr 17 11:21:31 stash login: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_unix.so: no >pam_sm_open_session() > Apr 17 21:18:33 stash login: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_unix.so: no >pam_sm_close_session() > > so perhaps the stubs should go back, or OpenPAM should learn to be less > noisy about the missing functions?
Actually, the bug is in the PAM configuration files that list pam_unix as a "session" module while pam_unix doesn't provide session management services. PAM is correct in whining about that. The solution is to remove lines like this from /etc/pam.d/*: session required pam_unix.so DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
