It seems Scott Long wrote: > > As I have stated several times, I have no problem with ATAPI being > > sent through CAM as long as the usual way stays (some of us cannot > > afford the weight of those extra layers, nor loose functionality). > > I'd do the integration somewhat differently to even further minimise > > the diffs, but that is really not the issue here... > > So if we can get *serious* commitment from a committer to take up > > these loose ends, lets talk about what to do, if not my offer stands :) > > I'll raise my hand here. I've been keenly interested in this for a > while, since it will make my UDF work much simpler. I'm also getting my
Hmm, your UDF code should know nothing about the lower layers, but we've been over that already :) > feet wet in CAM, and I have the two CAM gurus nearby if things get too > hairy. I fully indend for this to be a cooperative effort with Thomas; > I'm mainly raising my hand to take the abuse that will no doubt happen > once in a while. Sure, maybe we should make Thomas a committer so he could look after it himself ? Interested ? Got the time ? I'm all ears for volounteers... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
