On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 12:57, Sxren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > >On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: > >> I'll quit the ATA/ATAPI development/maintenance if this goes in quickly. > > > >What? Are you looking at the same patches that everyone else is? > > Read the rest of my mail, the problem is not the patches as much > as it is all the issues getting it to work and helping users > that has problems with it. I have more than enough to do already, > getting X mails extra a day asking why app XX doesn't work with > drive YY is not what I'm looking for. > > >I'd expect this sort of foot-dragging if the patch were intrusive to the > >ATA drivers but its not. > > As I have stated several times, I have no problem with ATAPI being > sent through CAM as long as the usual way stays (some of us cannot > afford the weight of those extra layers, nor loose functionality). > I'd do the integration somewhat differently to even further minimise > the diffs, but that is really not the issue here... > So if we can get *serious* commitment from a committer to take up > these loose ends, lets talk about what to do, if not my offer stands :) > > -Søren >
I'll raise my hand here. I've been keenly interested in this for a while, since it will make my UDF work much simpler. I'm also getting my feet wet in CAM, and I have the two CAM gurus nearby if things get too hairy. I fully indend for this to be a cooperative effort with Thomas; I'm mainly raising my hand to take the abuse that will no doubt happen once in a while. Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
