Mark Murray wrote:
> > Yes. And to allow PAM stack to make right decision, pam_opie pass special
> > information to PAM stack. Look at the patch, pam_opie not breaks from the
> > stack by yourself, it is /etc/pam* do that using information from
> > pam_opie.
> 
> Sure - but you are making specialised use of the return value that
> assumes that pam_opie will be followed by pam_unix. This violates
> the PAM spec.

Cool discussion.

Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to
integrate PAM and Kerberos?  8-) 8-) 8-).

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to