"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes. And to allow PAM stack to make right decision, pam_opie pass special > information to PAM stack. Look at the patch, pam_opie not breaks from the > stack by yourself, it is /etc/pam* do that using information from > pam_opie.
What I can't understand is why OPIE is making that decision in the first place. The only answer I can think of is that it was written before the advent of PAM, and tries to be a poor man's PAM. That is not its place. In any case, if I understand what you're trying to do, it can be done by returning PAM_SUCCESS if OPIE authentication succeeded, PAM_IGNORE if it failed but Unix authentication is still allowed, and PAM_AUTH_ERR if OPIE failed and Unix authentication is *not* allowed. In that case, if you mark pam_opie "sufficient", pam_unix will run only if OPIE authentication failed but allowed Unix authentication to proceed. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
