On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:54:08PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > FreeBSD is getting military contracts now. We need to think ahead to > > the needs of a whole new class of admin and user, and they are in > > highly restrictive environments that preclude `mv /usr/local/bin/*sh > > /bin`. > > And those people that are working there are probably programming in COBOL > and Fortran. > Sigh. A stupid language war troll. You haven't looked at the Fortran language since 1977 have you? Back to the topic at hand, bash isn't in the root filesystem. Get over it. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jim Bryant
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Nate Williams
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Nate Williams
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Terry Lambert
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Gordon Tetlow
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Steve Kargl
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Gordon Tetlow
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jim Bryant
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? The Anarcat
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Andrew Boothman
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jim Bryant
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Gordon Tetlow
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jos Backus