On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 13:22:10 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:59:45 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Maybe it is just my bad English understanding, but it seems last two cases > > must be > > ./foo/ .// > > ./foo/bar .//bar > > No, because the ``resulting filename'' begins with a slash. It seems resulting filename (pathname?) begins with "./" (not a slash). I.e. I don't understand how "filename" can ever begin with "/", maybe they means "pathname" instead? "/" is not valid _filename_ component. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.c... Matt Dillon
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Bruce Evans
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Bakul Shah
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Matt Dillon
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Wa... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Bruce Evans
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Matt Dillon
- Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: R... Bruce Evans