On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 02:14:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > No, it doesn't, because you bumped the libc major. Set it to 500 like > we discussedm, and commit (or I will, damnit). Uh, NO. It was discussed on IRC, NOT -arch. It needs to go there before doing something like this. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Daniel Eischen
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Dag-Erling Smorgrav