Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/stdio.diff3 Except that we bump to 500 instead of 6, and back to 5 before -RELEASE. When we've branched RELENG_5, if we need to bump libc's major in 6.0-CURRENT, we bump it to 600, then 601 etc. as many times as we want, and bump it down to 6 before 6.0-RELEASE. People tracking -CURRENT will end up with a handful of different libc versions, but they'll avoid the pains we're going through now, and people upgrading from RELENG_N to RELENG_N+1 will never see a libc major version increase of more than 1. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Paul RichardsF