-On [20000822 08:50], Warner Losh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >Actually, the real reason is that MMC drives that mostly support the >standard, but do it wrong in ways that are hard to detect. Those are >going to be the worst to try to support. There are some drives out >there that just hang when you issue them certain MMC commands, as an >example. They shouldn't but they do and you have to be careful not to >send them these commands. This got parsed by me as: mmc-quirk.h It wouldn't be hard to keep it tracked in a quirk file as per the SCSI disk quirk file. But I am not sure it is elegant. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl There is no joy in smallness. Joy is in the infinite... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for SCSI ... Mike Meyer
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Kenneth D. Merry
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Mike Meyer
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Kenneth D. Merry
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Warner Losh
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Mike Meyer
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Mike Meyer
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Warner Losh
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for SCSI ... Laurence Berland
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Kenneth D. Merry
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Paul Richards
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Alexander Leidinger
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Paul Richards
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for S... Soren Schmidt
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for SCSI cds? Christopher Masto
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for SCSI cds? Mike Meyer
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for SCSI cds? Christopher Masto
- Re: Why no CDR ioctls for SCSI cds? Mike Meyer