Re: Difference in "netstat -rn" output in the last 2 months

[Alexander Leidinger]

Am 2025-01-28 18:32, schrieb Maxim Sobolev:

I also think this should be reverted back to default. "-n" refers to IP to name functionality, "default" is clearly a special case. If someone wants it, some other option can be added to emit 0.0.0.0/0 [1] (not sure why but ok).

Bye,
Alexander.

This was discussed in the review referenced in the commit. The -nn proposal was there too. Personally I agree with the rationales in favor of "-nn".

-Max

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 5:46 PM Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote:

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 04:58:57PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
A> something has changed in the output of "netstat -rn" between

A> could be related to some other stuff (netlink maybe?).
A>
A> Does this ring a bell for someone?





Maybe double -nn should introduce new behavior?

--
Gleb Smirnoff

A> 2024-11-23-195545 and 2025-01-22-151306. The default route is not listed as A> "default" anymore, but with "0.0.0.0" resp. "::/0". This breaks some tools A> (e.g. iocage). Iocage uses python, I'm not sure if it uses netstat or some A> other interface, so it may not be directly related to netstat itself but This is very likely changed by 9206c79961986c2114a9a2cfccf009ac010ad259. Allan, may be make exclusion for the "default" to keep POLA? Otherwise, indeed at time of 15.0-RELEASE we will receive some negative feedback :)

--
http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.org    netch...@freebsd.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF

Links:
------
[1] http://0.0.0.0/0

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature