Мы работаем над вашим запросом. Нам понадобилось чуть больше времени, чтобы решить ваш вопрос #262198104. Еще 24 часа, и мы постараемся к вам вернуться. Приносим извинения за неудобства.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это письмо, так как оно сформировано автоматически. Sincerely, Mokka Support Team [#ID-262198104] Friday, December 27, 2024 3:06 PM, owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org: > Nice! I will do that, `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` directly on port config ala > linux distros. > > Thanks! > > Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> escreveu (sexta, 27/12/2024 à(s) > 14:54): > >> On Fri 27 Dec 14:24, Nuno Teixeira wrote: >> > Perfect! >> > >> > I'm thinking using a radio option where we can select one of xml >> parsers or >> > none as supported upstream, defaulting to TINYXML. >> > >> > A quick look in repology shows that at least 3 linux distros use >> directly >> > `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` with 0.15.0 pkgs. I'm ok with simplifying port >> or >> > keep radio option. >> > >> > Cheers! >> >> My understanding is users have no idea what the difference is, upstream >> recommands their new xmlrpc implementation, we probably only provide this >> implementation and if we have reports of issues without, switch back to >> the >> xmlrpc-c based one until upstream fixes the issue. >> >> Which means in the end drop entirely the option ;) >> >> Best regards, >> Bapt >> > > > -- > Nuno Teixeira > FreeBSD UNIX: <edua...@freebsd.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org >
