Nice! I will do that, `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` directly on port config ala linux distros.
Thanks! Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> escreveu (sexta, 27/12/2024 à(s) 14:54): > On Fri 27 Dec 14:24, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Perfect! > > > > I'm thinking using a radio option where we can select one of xml parsers > or > > none as supported upstream, defaulting to TINYXML. > > > > A quick look in repology shows that at least 3 linux distros use directly > > `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` with 0.15.0 pkgs. I'm ok with simplifying port > or > > keep radio option. > > > > Cheers! > > My understanding is users have no idea what the difference is, upstream > recommands their new xmlrpc implementation, we probably only provide this > implementation and if we have reports of issues without, switch back to the > xmlrpc-c based one until upstream fixes the issue. > > Which means in the end drop entirely the option ;) > > Best regards, > Bapt > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: <edua...@freebsd.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org
