On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 9:23 PM Rebecca Cran <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mar 29, 2020, at 9:11 PM, Nathan Whitehorn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > The problem then is that we have treated loader as a > > continuously-updatable part of the OS, like the kernel, and the update > > system and development process assumes they get updated in sync. > > But at the moment how often do users mount the ESP and update loader.efi > on it? So it seems it rarely _needs_ to be updated at the moment. > True, but as we move from boot1.efi to loader.efi, the need will grow... Even if we keep boot1.efi, loader.efi will be needed for interesting secure systems, so we can't cop-out like we have in the past. Warner _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
