> On 3/29/20 6:11 AM, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > > > > 3. based solution looks good to me. > > > > IMHO, assuming /efi/bootx[64|32].efi is boot1.efi or loader.efi > > or EFI environment pointing to either one is properly used, > > > That's another thing: we should be installing loader.efi as > \efi\boot\bootx64.efi (as well as \boot\freebsd\loader.efi) since it's > entirely possible to lose the Boot Manager entry and end up with an > unbootable system as a result. Unfortunately people have had bad > experiences with other operating systems overwriting bootx64.efi and > don't believe we should do that. > > > Perhaps I just need to come up with a proof of concept or demo to show > that it is possible without breaking other OSes.
Yes please. > Rebecca Cran -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
