On 08/11/2015 21:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Here's the same commit, and the difference between 1.8 and 1.9:% git cat-file commit 803795d tree 7fc83aba022834da5c218114b09ad4640735bcc0 parent c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5 author olgeni <olg...@freebsd.org> 1437203525 +0000 committer olgeni <olg...@freebsd.org> 1437203525 +0000 Upgrade to version 0.4.1. % git cat-file commit 61ca43b tree 7fc83aba022834da5c218114b09ad4640735bcc0 parent c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5 author olgeni <olg...@freebsd.org> 1437203529 +0000 committer olgeni <olg...@freebsd.org> 1437203529 +0000 Upgrade to version 0.4.1. In case you don't see it, there's a 4s difference in the timestamps for authoring and committing. Here's the original: % svn log -vc392405 svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r392405 | olgeni | 2015-07-18 09:12:05 +0200 (Sat, 18 Jul 2015) | 2 lines Changed paths: M /head/www/elixir-maru/Makefile M /head/www/elixir-maru/distinfo Upgrade to version 0.4.1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ So yeah, svn 1.9 returned a timestamp that was off by 4s. WTF?
4 seconds?? There have been 4 leap seconds added this century. Did 1.9 add timestamp corrections relating to leap seconds? Did the developer not use leapsecs when the svn server does? -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
