> On Mar 2, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Andrey Chernov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> The responsibility is on you to provide something better, both the >> architecture AND code. So if you want it backed out, then write something >> better. Otherwise step back and let progress happen. > > As it seems you know a lot about my responsibility and duty, I am very > surprised by your broad interests. If you let me to speak for myself a > bit, I can tell what I feel. In this particular case my responsibility > is just to give good advice at the road fork with one way leads to > obvious hell, nothing more. I already express my opinion from the > technical point of view and don't want to participate in the flame war, > so continue this thread without me, please. >
Other bad ideas (in the past) were support for threads, kernel threads, SMP, etc in the project's past. So maybe trying something new might be a good idea. At the end of the day, if in a year we think it's really terrible then it can be replaced, ripped out, or better yet can be fixed. What's worse than a bad idea is not moving on any ideas. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
