On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy write > s: > > >IMHO, it's not such a bad idea. freebsd-current _is_ the place to > >report problems with -current, why can't the report be produced by a > >daemon? All the MUA's I've ever used allowed me to delete a mail > >before reading all of it, so I don't see that having detailed > >information (at the end) is a real issue (though it might be for > >someove paying by the byte). > > I agree. As one of those who pays for an incoming traffic I'm prefer a short letter with a list of directories where warning/errors happens and an URL with full listing. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Paul Richards
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Peter Jeremy
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Szilveszter Adam
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Anatoly Vorobey
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Mike Nowlin
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Boris Popov
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Narvi
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Narvi
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Bill Fumerola
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: FreeBSD Build status David O'Brien
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Bruce Evans
- Re: FreeBSD Build status David O'Brien
- Re: FreeBSD Build status Warner Losh