On 4 Sep 2013, at 23:38, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about: > undefined reference to `powl' > > It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet in libm, am I > missing something? I've attached a diff that I'd like to commit to msun that should allow these things to link. This: - Provides thin wrappers around the 8 missing libm functions that libc++ exposes that just call the double versions - Makes these weak references, so other libraries can replace them with more precise versions if required - On platforms where long double is greater precision than double (e.g. x86), it emits a linker warning when they are referenced These can then be replaced by proper versions as they become available (at which point the linker warnings will go away). David
imprecise.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
