On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:05:45AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Sep 5, 2013, at 00:38, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I'm running exp-run to build the whole ports tree with clang using libc++ by > > default. > > > > As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about: > > undefined reference to `powl' > > > > It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet in libm, am > > I > > missing something? > > > Do you have a concrete example of a port that gives this result? We do > have powl these days, but maybe some configure script is trying to be > smart and does not pass -lm to the linker flags... > > -Dimitry >
http://pb2.nyi.freebsd.org/bulk/nogcc-default/2013-09-04_18h36m06s/logs/errors/domc-0.8.0_1.log I tried adding -lm to the linker and it failed, when was powl added? Here is another example: http://pb2.nyi.freebsd.org/bulk/nogcc-default/2013-09-04_18h36m06s/logs/errors/iverilog-0.9.6.log regards, Bapt
pgps9bJwvsXwF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
