On 14.04.13 21:55, Joe Holden wrote:
For non-nat ipfw is still superior in every way, numbered rules (think: scripts), dummynet, much faster than pf, syntax is a lot nicer and predictable...
And, best of all, it still is buggy. At lest, it's tables handling is unusable.
I have been very stubborn IPFW user for very long time, but finally gave up in favor of PF. Nothing like that ever since. I am also not convinced IPFW is any faster than PF.
Daniel _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
