On Wednesday 08 August 2012 23:51:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 August 2012 19:24:18 Ed Schouten wrote: > > > 2012/8/8 Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net>: > > > >> I have a question regarding the changed fragment of code. Why don't > > > >> you use unr(9) KPI to manage unit numbers ? > > > > > > > > Probably I could, but right now the unr interface doesn't support > > > > pending unit free which I need for other reasons, see below. > > > > > > What does `pending unit free' mean? I also would prefer it if you used > > > unr(9) -- not just here, but across the entire USB stack. > > > > It is like a drain state, where a unit is collected for free, and then > > committed to free state when the tsw_free() is called. In the [unlocked] > > time in between the unit cannot be re-used. > > Still, why do you need such intermediate state ? You cannot reuse the unit > number while it is in the 'pending free' still, AFAIU.
Because of the order in which structures are freed. See other e-mail. --HPS _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
