2012/8/8 Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]>: >> I have a question regarding the changed fragment of code. Why don't you use >> unr(9) KPI to manage unit numbers ? > > Probably I could, but right now the unr interface doesn't support pending unit > free which I need for other reasons, see below.
What does `pending unit free' mean? I also would prefer it if you used unr(9) -- not just here, but across the entire USB stack. > Ed: I would really like to see a custom argument for the tsw_free(), because > it only needs to know the unit number, and the xsc for UCOM is freed when this > is called and cannot be referred. Is it possible to have a separate "void *" > for the tsw_free() function? Is this something which you can implement? We could extend the TTY code to allow the softc to be changed, e.g. tty_set_softc(). This function could be called right before calling tty_rel_gone(). Still, I would prefer it if these kind of things would not be part of the API. Is there really no way the deallocation of the softc can be delayed until tsw_free() is called? Thanks, -- Ed Schouten <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
