On 08/30/2011 05:21 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/30/11 12:31, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 08/30/2011 12:59 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
But I also express my opinion that updating such a document should be
done by a third party.
I slightly disagree with that.
No problem
Who else than the developer/core team
members know better about what's
in and what's not in the FreeBSD box?
So, for a features listing, it's OK. I really agree on turning it into a
feature list.
For a _comparison_, I think it's up to somewhere else:
To really compare, it's mandatory to really now the multiple compared
items. Who cares about the latest MS Windows internals (deep networking
capability, filesystem tricks, kernel scheduler specs,...) in here?
I migh be wrong, but IMHO "core devs" and "power users" wont spend time
to deeply investigate on the other systems.
Again, just an opinion.
--
RMA.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
