On 6 Jun 1999, Joel Ray Holveck wrote:
> By default, KDE installs to /usr/local/kde. On RedHat, the RPM
> installs it to /opt/kde. All the includes are in
> /usr/local/kde/include, the libs in /usr/local/kde/lib, etc.
Yup.
> Most KDE programs, including the configure scripts, look for the
> KDEDIR environment variable. I believe that the correct thing to do
> with FreeBSD's KDE install is to set KDEDIR to /usr/local. I do this
> in /etc/profile and /etc/csh.cshrc here. (I have KDE in
> /usr/local/kde here, too, so I haven't tested it as /usr/local.)
KDEDIR is depreciated.
> --prefix specifies where it should install to. However, this app
> needs to find some 3rd-party include files, so --prefix is not
> appropriate.
Uh no. The prefix is also used by the configuration script to figure out
where the kdelibs were installed to. From configure:
ac_default_prefix=${KDEDIR:-/usr/local/kde}
[...]
includedir='${prefix}/include'
[...]
echo $ac_n "checking for KDE""... $ac_c" 1>&6
echo "configure:4014: checking for KDE" >&5
if test "${prefix}" != NONE; then
kde_includes=${prefix}/include
ac_kde_includes=$prefix/include
> FWIW, I've found that using /usr/local/kde instead of /usr/local has,
> in my case, been most helpful. I don't advocate it for every tiny
> library, but for something as large and complex as KDE, it works well.
Yes, KDE scatters too many things too many places to really be a good fit
in /usr/local/kde. Plus putting it in its own directory makes for easy
removal and switching between versions of KDE.
- alex
I thought felt your touch
In my car, on my clutch
But I guess it's just someone who felt a lot like I remember you.
- Translator
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
