Anthony Kimball wrote:
>
> : Against that there is a general Linuxism/Kitchen-Sink feeling.
>
> Think of this case as a plan9-ism.
I think nothing of it... My opinions wouldn't matter a tiny little
bit. :-)
Still, after reading the Samba reply to the Microsoft, err,
Mindcraft NTvsLinus benchmark, and the comments on tuning through
/proc, I have to say I'd feel disgusted to have something like that
on FreeBSD. It gave a whole new meaning to the word "arcane".
Still, I'm against process privacy. We ought to be able to know
anything about how a process is using *our* (the system's)
resources. At least until we get proper compartimentalized security,
which a number of people few is very un-Unix-like. :-)
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
"Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
