> And does this all mean that if I want my kernel source tree to be > consistent more often than not (and any errors be fixed as soon as > possible), I'd be better off switching from -stable to -current?
Yes and no. Stable will give you a broken tree less often. But people in Current have a habit of fixing things first in Current :-) The ideal combination: Running stable and keeping track of current, backporting whatever you think is of use to you. Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
