p...@originative.co.uk writes: > > From: Richard Tobin [mailto:rich...@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] > > Is this fix going into stable? (I'm a little surprised that such a > > change was considered appropriate for the stable branch in the first > > place.) > > I didn't think the memory allocation change was in stable but I may merge > the lnc changes back into -stable anyway since it's a cleaner way of doing > things. > > I've got some other lnc problems to fix first though.
Will this take very long? Because my "stable" source tree has not produced a working kernel for me for several weeks because of this. And does this all mean that if I want my kernel source tree to be consistent more often than not (and any errors be fixed as soon as possible), I'd be better off switching from -stable to -current? -- Frode Vatvedt Fjeld To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
