In message <[email protected]>, Lowell Gilbert writes: >Mikhail Teterin <[email protected]> writes: > >> Sorry. I'm just repeating what Ladavac Marino wrote in >> <[email protected]>: >> >> LM: Please note that memory overcommit architectures are a >> LM: rather common optimization; FreeBSD is one of them. They >> LM: do, however, break the ISO/ANSI C conformance (strictly >> LM: speaking). >> >> Since there was no immediate (nor later) rebuttal, I assumed, that >> everyone quietly agreed... > >[...] Heck, the >*existence* of kill(1) and SIGKILL would be enough to make for a >non-conforming C environment.
See RFC 748 for more details. Please let this thread die now. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [email protected] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
