Chuck Robey once wrote:
> This is the part that gets me. You keep claiming ANSI C
> non-compliance, and we are compliant. If you want to claim
> non-compliance, then get out the spec and quote chapter and verse.
> There is nothing in the spec that says how the underlying OS has to
> treat processes on a global scale.
Sorry. I'm just repeating what Ladavac Marino wrote in
<55586e7391acd211b9730000c1100276179...@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at>:
LM: Please note that memory overcommit architectures are a
LM: rather common optimization; FreeBSD is one of them. They
LM: do, however, break the ISO/ANSI C conformance (strictly
LM: speaking).
Since there was no immediate (nor later) rebuttal, I assumed, that
everyone quietly agreed...
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
