On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 07:19:15PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
[..]
> etc? This is what the original poster suggested, and nobody has really
> given a good response what is wrong with the "grouping" being expressed
> in the modules' name. Mike Smith and Andrzej Bialecki have given good
> reasons why *not* to go to a subdirectory structure.
What would you name a network stack? For example:
net_mpls_tdp.ko
net_mpls_ldp.ko
net_mpls_core.ko
or
net_h323v2_yada.ko
net_h323v2_yadayada.ko
net_h323v2_barf.ko
or
codec_g711.ko
codec_g7231a.ko
codec_g729.ko
Is that acceptable? Anyone have better ideas?
Cheers,
Chris
--
"Logic is a little bird, sitting in a tree; that smells *awful*."
-- /usr/bin/fortune
[Disclaimer: I speak for myself and my views are my own and not in any way to
be construed as the views of BellSouth Corporation. ]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
