In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob Bishop wrote: > > > BUT I have to say that on principle I'm with Rod on this one: EOF > > != EOT and mixing them up is a recipe for (inter alia) finding you > > can't read back dumps when you need them. > > Not to mention the fact that the old ANSI standard for nine-track > tapes included a double EOF to indicate EOT/EOD (and the more modern > tapes _did_ have an EOT marker). Consider me another person with > extensive tape experience chiming in _against_ this idea. You can add my voice to the chorus too. John -- John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "No matter how cynical I get, I just can't keep up." -- Nora Ephron To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Bob Bishop
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver J Wunsch
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Frank Mayhar
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver John Polstra
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Greg Lehey
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver- O... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver- O... Greg Lehey
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver- O... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver- O... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver- O... J Wunsch
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver- O... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Greg Lehey
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob