Bob Bishop wrote: > At 11:01 am -0800 15/11/99, Matthew Jacob wrote: > >I repeat what I said in other mail- can you actually show me a tape drive > >where what I propose really doesn't work? > BUT I have to say that on principle I'm with Rod on this one: EOF != EOT > and mixing them up is a recipe for (inter alia) finding you can't read back > dumps when you need them. Not to mention the fact that the old ANSI standard for nine-track tapes included a double EOF to indicate EOT/EOD (and the more modern tapes _did_ have an EOT marker). Consider me another person with extensive tape experience chiming in _against_ this idea. And, yes, "blank check" means something entirely different from EOT. Conflating the two opens up a real can of worms. -- Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Bob Bishop
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... J Wunsch
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Frank Mayhar
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... John Polstra
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Greg Lehey
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Greg Lehey
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... J Wunsch
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Drive... Matthew Jacob
- Re: FreeBSD 4.0 SCSI Tape Driver Greg Lehey