Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:39:10 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Would it be possible to either ignore binary files when "-l" is in affect. OR to add an ignore binary file flag (like FreeBSD has in 2.x and 3.x)? The latter sounds reasonable, though it'd have to be spelled differently from -a since -a is now taken. Perhaps --skip-binary-files, by analogy with the existing --directories=skip option? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty binary detection... Thomas Stromberg
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty binary ... David O'Brien
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty bin... Thomas Stromberg
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty bin... Paul Eggert
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty... David O'Brien
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, fa... Paul Eggert
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURREN... David O'Brien
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty bin... Alain Magloire
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty... Peter Jeremy
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, fa... Alain Magloire
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, faulty... David O'Brien
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURRENT, fa... Paul Eggert
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CURREN... David O'Brien
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in -CU... Alain Magloire
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in... David O'Brien
- Re: Bad 'grep' behaviour in... Paul Eggert