According to David Malone: > But if the real master process forks and then it's child closes the fd > which the lock was on, then the master process will have lost it's lock. > Is this likely? Does the real master fork children to do stuff? All the time. "master" is an inetd-like daemon which spawn children according to master.cf. Everything run by Postfix is a child of "master"... I see your point and that's likely what happen. You're confirming what I thought about locking brokeness. That's bad. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #75: Tue Nov 2 21:03:12 CET 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Ollivier Robert
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT David O'Brien
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT David Malone
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Dmitrij Tejblum
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURR... Brian Fundakowski Feldman
- Re: Serious locking problem in ... Dmitrij Tejblum
- Re: Serious locking proble... Brian Fundakowski Feldman
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Ollivier Robert
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT David Malone
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURR... Ollivier Robert
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT David Malone
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Ben Smithurst
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURR... David Malone
- Re: Serious locking problem in ... Vincent Poy