On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 02:01:02AM +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote: > Right but in Postfix case this is not the case. The "master" process run to > check whether Postfix is running or not is definitely NOT a child of the real > "master" process. But if the real master process forks and then it's child closes the fd which the lock was on, then the master process will have lost it's lock. Is this likely? Does the real master fork children to do stuff? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Serious locking problem in CURRENT Ollivier Robert
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Ollivier Robert
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT David O'Brien
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT David Malone
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURR... Dmitrij Tejblum
- Re: Serious locking problem in ... Brian Fundakowski Feldman
- Re: Serious locking proble... Dmitrij Tejblum
- Re: Serious locking pr... Brian Fundakowski Feldman
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT Ollivier Robert
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURR... David Malone
- Re: Serious locking problem in ... Ollivier Robert
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT David Malone
- Re: Serious locking problem in CURR... Ben Smithurst
- Re: Serious locking problem in ... David Malone
- Re: Serious locking proble... Vincent Poy