> DUL, while I'm not sure whether we should take this to -chat or not since > we are now getting into noise on the -current list, is also a good thing. > simply because noone on a dialup has reason to be sending mail directly to > me, they should be sending it through thier ISP's mail servers. There is a list called SPAM-L, where this is all on-topic. There is a lot of flamage, but the content is filterable. Askme if you want to get on... M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to d... Pat Lynch
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk ... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to ... Pat Lynch
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Mark Murray
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Brian Somers
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialu... Gary Palmer
- SMTP AUTH (was Re: On hub.freebsd.org ...) Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialu... Ollivier Robert
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Mark Murray
- Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Anthony Kimball
- Mark Murray