> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams writes: > : > I think we need to set the interrupt mask to 0 in the PIC. > : > : I don't think makes any difference, since the APM Bios is in charge of > : what happens at this point, and the BIOS is below the level of the OS. > : > > The theory is that no more interrupts would come in. However, I think > there is another reason that you might be right.... "Standby" needs > to be able to wakeup on keyboard events, which needs interrupts > enabled... Actually, that's almost entirely system-dependant. The BIOS may well poll the keyboard controller/USB controller, for example. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: followup to apm problems. Nick Hibma
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mike Muir
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mitsuru IWASAKI
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mitsuru IWASAKI
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mike Muir
- Re: followup to apm problems. Kazutaka YOKOTA
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mike Muir
- Re: followup to apm problems. Warner Losh
- Re: followup to apm problems. Nate Williams
- Re: followup to apm problems. Warner Losh
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mike Smith
- Re: followup to apm problems. Garrett Wollman
- Re: followup to apm problems. Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mike Smith
- Re: followup to apm problems. Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: followup to apm problems. Warner Losh
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mike Smith
- Re: followup to apm problems. Warner Losh
- Re: followup to apm problems. Mike Smith
- Re: followup to apm problems. Garrett Wollman